This is a theoretical piece which concludes the years of work I have put into refining and correcting the ‘double-solution’ to the transformation problem. The solution remains loyal to Marx’s methodology found in Chapter 9 of Volume 3 and is employed to complete the solution to the transformation problem. I will say it again, the law of value stands or falls on our ability to explain the transformation problem and therefore the relation between underlying values and circulating prices.
I have been asked why the two distributions of 26 need to be equivalent. The reason is that the first distribution of 26 yields specific ‘prices of commodities’ which when they circulate becoming input prices, yield specific prices of capital. Only by using the second 26 (divided between capital and profit) are those specific prices captured. Anything more than 26 and anything less than 26 would yield different prices of capital. Thus the prices of capital found in the articles are not accidental, rather they are real as if executed by competition.
Recent Comments