TRUMP’S LAST GASP ATTEMPT TO DOMINATE RUSSIA AND CHINA. The next two months are critical.
October 26, 2025 5 Comments
United Parcel Services released its financials on the 28th October. Its parcel volumes in Q3 yoy in the US segment was down 12.3%. Of this fall 5.5% was accounted for by voluntarily relinquishing Amazon runs. The fall in parcel deliveries adjusted for this was still significant confirming my observations in the above article that the volume of goods production and deliveries, as far as the mass market is concerned is shrinking. and because this is the 8th quarter of shrinkage, the cumulative losses are now substantial. https://investors.ups.com/_assets/_ef7d88211c0730938dd9ca5186deb1e8/ups/db/1111/10959/file/UPS+3Q25+Earnings+Webcast+Deck+FINAL.pdf
THEPLANNINGMOTIVE.COM 
You make it sound like war between the US and China is inevitable, even drawing parallels with Japan in the war over oil, except that now it’s chip-making machines and rare earths that is the catalyst but in 1941, the US industrial war machine was omnipotent, it was inevitable that Japan would lose (what with Red Army locking it down the Far East). So it seems that you’re saying that the US has no other choice but war, war, war in a last ditch attempt to stave off the inevitable? So what of the rest of us, are we reduced to being passive observers of our (and the Earth’s) destruction?
I have always proposed turning the international Palestinian movement into an international anti-war movement before the capitalists turn the entire planet into Gaza
Sent from AOL on Android
imo- 1.NATO/EU have more power than in 1945 but less than they had before 1917. There was no attack on USSR directly from 1945-1991 ( total war ie cold war happened except direct hot war due to nukes)
2.NATO/WEU represented/sided with ruling classes everywhere on the planet while WARSAW pact+china was on the side of working classes till china turned towards NATO/WEU after what khruschev did in 1959).
3. NATO/WEU did cold war against threat of communism ie., rule by former subjects
4.Now NATO/EU did a veritable nuclear war on planet economies (tariff and other threats) , after initiating proxy war directly against Russia by using ukraine (no less) in it’s home turf (Europe). Due to this, india stopped importing Russian oil(20% of total russian oil). Now only china is importing oil from Russia and china won’t fold like india because china is also targeted. So, the entire world is tilted towards NATO/EU power like it was before 1976.
5.In view of above, why would there be a war between USA and china as both have nukes and NATO/EU has a great record of using other forces to bring countries down?
6.i think current meeting between china & USA would be about stopping Russian oil flow to china before NATO/EU does other measures like pressuring other countries to stop chinese imports over a period of time like with Russian oil,
You are right that nuclear weapons are a restraining factor. It’s interesting that Russia has just carried out a full nuclear exercise deploying all their new rockets. On the other side there have been strong rumours for a number of years that the USA has repurposed its nuclear warheads down to 5 kiloton yields, equal to a 500 bomber raid in WW2 but more accurate. If that is true it makes these nukes tactically usable purposed to take out airfields, military bases, ports and so on.
5 kiloton, 50 kiloton – I don’t think it makes any difference to Russia, if there’s a nuke strike on Russia (which would have to be preemptive), the Russians have stated that they would launch a devastating strike on the Empire. The US knows this so, do they want to risk it? The US have always used their nukes as blackmail weapons.